|
| |
|
Verified Response
Frequently Asked Questions
Why
doesn't the City just charge more for alarms and hire more officers?
-
This still puts the burden on the
PD/City (tracking, billing and collecting) instead of the alarm
owners and companies who are responsible for the problem.
-
It would be unwise to hire
officers through an unpredictable revenue stream.
Why
don't we just charge the alarm companies for false alarms and let them
collect from the customer?
They would have to add new
divisions to their organizational charts to deal with this and, much
like us, don't want to have to deal with the
tracking/billing/collecting on huge numbers of false alarms.
This method also places the
burden on the city to track/bill/and collect from the alarm
companies instead of the alarm owners.
If you
adopt this policy, will my homeowners insurance increase?
Many insurance companies
give discounts for burglar alarms and slightly larger discounts for
a "monitored" burglar alarm. The companies are not concerned
with who monitors the alarm.
Should
we expect our burglary rate to increase?
Considering that almost all
of our alarms are false, there is no correlation between alarms and
actual burglaries.
The mere presence of an
alarm can deter burglars. Police Officers responding to the
sound of an alarm after the alarm has been activated is not the
deterrent.
Officers having additional
free time will be much more beneficial in reducing burglaries than
responding to false alarms. With this additional free time,
officers can spend more time:
-
Making enforcement contacts
with suspicious persons
-
Patrolling areas with higher
rates of burglaries
-
Focusing on gang members,
drug abusers, parolees and probationers who are more likely to
commit such crimes
Will
Fontana residents become crime victims in their own homes if you don't
respond to burglar alarms?
-
Burglar alarms are designed to protect property,
not people.
-
Manually activated alarms
such as panic/duress alarms, robbery and medical aid alarms ARE
designed to protect people. We will continue to respond to
these alarms and they will continue to be given a high priority.
I pay
my taxes and your salaries. I want my tax dollars being used so that
officers will continue to respond to my alarm.
The alarms we are responding
to are ALMOST ALWAYS false.
Automatic police response is
a personal service to alarm owners that has become detrimental to
the public at large.
Owning and operating an
alarm is a PRIVATE contract with a
PRIVATE for-profit firm, for a PRIVATE
service.
City police officers are NOT
paid to be security guards for alarm companies or alarm owners and
this, unfortunately, is exactly what has occurred over the past
several decades.
Return to Top
Back to Main Page |
|
|
|